533
edits
On the Origins and Nature of the Dark Calculus: Difference between revisions
On the Origins and Nature of the Dark Calculus (view source)
Revision as of 17:27, 6 September 2020
, 17:27, 6 September 2020→Summary: typo
imported>Trashmonks (Updated by syntaxaire with game version 2.0.200.71 using QBE v1.0rc2) |
Syntaxaire (talk | contribs) m (→Summary: typo) |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
<math>\therefore Q</math> | <math>\therefore Q</math> | ||
|} | |} | ||
A theorist from the | A theorist from the seminary the Cupola formulated the basic concept of the dark calculus. It became a full fledged formal system, which defines the grammar, symbols, and set of rules to derive further concepts and theorems. | ||
In mathematics, a theorem is a sort of statement about how the universe functions and must be proven with proofs. Proofs are essentially the step by step guide to how the theorem works. In this case, some theories proven using dark calculus will become false once the proofs are complete. With this discovery, systems based off of dark calculus were created and even more fragile, some making theorems false upon even the proposition (Assume ____ is true). | In mathematics, a theorem is a sort of statement about how the universe functions and must be proven with proofs. Proofs are essentially the step by step guide to how the theorem works. In this case, some theories proven using dark calculus will become false once the proofs are complete. With this discovery, systems based off of dark calculus were created and even more fragile, some making theorems false upon even the proposition (Assume ____ is true). | ||