8,756
edits
On the Origins and Nature of the Dark Calculus: Difference between revisions
On the Origins and Nature of the Dark Calculus (view source)
Revision as of 20:19, 22 June 2019
, 20:19, 22 June 2019no edit summary
m (Quote break revert) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} {{As Of Patch | 2.0.182.0}} | ||
{{Item | {{Item | ||
| title = {{Color | W | On the Origins and Nature of the Dark Calculus}} | | title = {{Color | W | On the Origins and Nature of the Dark Calculus}} | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== Contents == | == Contents == | ||
{{ | {{Book Page|&CEditor's note: this excerpt is published with permission from the notes of Barathrum the Old. | ||
There's evidence in the arithmetic record that the study of formal systems reached a pernicious apex in the Long Before. Advancements made by mathematicians such as Russell, Gödel, Eisencruft, Atufu, Wheatgrass, and System Star contributed to the understanding of notions like undecidability, pointed regularism, and abyssalism. Upon reaching this minimal degree of mathematical maturity, equipped with sophisticated grammars, researchers set out to experiment with the limits of expressibility. They contrived bold research programs and galloped into the mathematical wood, unwitting of the dangers that brood there. | There's evidence in the arithmetic record that the study of formal systems reached a pernicious apex in the Long Before. Advancements made by mathematicians such as Russell, Gödel, Eisencruft, Atufu, Wheatgrass, and System Star contributed to the understanding of notions like undecidability, pointed regularism, and abyssalism. Upon reaching this minimal degree of mathematical maturity, equipped with sophisticated grammars, researchers set out to experiment with the limits of expressibility. They contrived bold research programs and galloped into the mathematical wood, unwitting of the dangers that brood there. | ||